Tscott wrote:
agaricus5 wrote:
1st place bonus - +16 (Only one person can get this)
I'm not understanding this part of your proposal. So the first person to get 1st place gets 16 points? Wouldn't that just be the first person to complete the room? Or do you get 16 points until someone beats you and then those 16 points get taken away from you and added to the person who beat you?
Oh, sorry. I meant that you get 16 points for being in first place in a room, just like the system we have now. I was just emphasising the idea that only one person can actually have those 16 points at any one time. Maybe I'll go and edit it.
Edit: Adding in reply to Neil's post.
Oneiromancer wrote:
Actually, Wesley, I was mostly trying to say that I view your "innovation bonus" as something that could be added to any high score system, and thus deserves being discussed on its own merits, but doesn't necessarily have any bearing on the discussion between the proposals we have so far...as far as I can tell, at least. I suppose if it were much more complementary to one proposal over the other, and people really liked it, then it could be considered in support of that proposal.
Ah, yes. I understand what you're talking about now (after about 5 reads). It was just something I thought might make the scoring system a little more fair in terms of rewarding the effort required to get a #1 placement a little better.
So, to get back to the base system, I think the current new system is better, since with Watcher's idea, the time aspect of things is still rather prominent, as Oneiromancer said, while with Maurog's idea, the 1/x factor will bias scores towards the top players by a factor rather than a number, so since the score ratio will be the same, as total scores get larger, the gap between players will increase exponentially, which wouldn't be very psychologically encouraging.
____________________________
Resident Medic/Mycologist
[Last edited by agaricus5 at 07-31-2005 08:21 PM]