coppro wrote:
But as for the vote, whenever we have a hold-building contest, the rules are verified, and then a topic started with each hold available for play and one humungous poll. You may rate them however you want.
That's simply not true. Here are some examples:
One room in a hold, or one hold in a room: Scores should be based on: Fun, Variation between all the different play-throughs of the room (e.g. if the room plays the same for each entrance, there's not much point), Economy (reusability of stairs and room elements) and Originality.
2005 Film Festival: After you've watched all nine of the films, please vote and give each one a rating between 1 (vomit-inducing) and 10 (simply the best) by how well you liked it. You may be more influenced by writing, the story idea, scripting prowess--it doesn't matter, use your own criteria.
Limited Resources: Rate them as you liked them.
The War of the Dungeons: 1) Entries should be judged based on how the new room compare with their older counterparts. Judge based on making sure the puzzle stays the same in all aspects, use of scripting in an ingenuitive and novel way (If they used scripting, that is), and the general feel you get from looking at the new version.
Let's say that I won't be a bit surprised if the rules are changed during the poll. It's not the first time.
[Last edited by Tim at 05-03-2006 12:59 AM]
