Maurog wrote:
The very existence of someone who can break the system on a whim and done so several times invalidates the entire system, in my humble opinion.
I think random modding can break the rank point system because the effect is permanent if not reversed, and much of the arguments swirling around it seem to be on the issue of having one's rank points decreased by, say 50, rather than, having 50 individual -1s. In that light, I would support the request to remove your rank point total from next to your posts and only have it appear in your profile.
However, negative modding seems to stir up debate with regards to post quality whenever it happens, so it nonetheless has the intended social effect, despite (or with the intention of) it being disruptive. In this case, Neather2 now has the opportunity to be
told in words why negative mods might have been given, which is better than a flamewar of sorts.
I would argue the modding system is broken if we all stopped caring whether a post is -1 or +1, or if, in fact, -1s become encouraged. I can see how negative mod crusades might do this if they became commonplace, but clearly, this isn't the case. There may be an elite few that are disrupting the rest of us with inappropriate -1s, but as long as it's considered disruption and not a normal occurrence, I disagree that the system's broken.
Indeed, (theoretical) mod point disruptors are probably relying on the fact that there
is a reliable reaction; I guess it may be considered fun to see the (mayhem) that only you know you've caused.
Click here to view the secret text
×Or for an analogy: allergy's no fun, but I'd rather have an immune system than lots of worms any day.
____________________________
Resident Medic/Mycologist
[Last edited by agaricus5 at 05-07-2009 05:05 PM]