Here's a listing of all my relevant PMs. The time each of them was sent should be self-explanatory.
×
Dischorran to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×An identical copy of the following was sent to VIPCOOL:
So I'm a bit worried about that last vote where Someone Else got ganged up on. Two former Tar tribe members self-voted, and the rest of the votes were scattered among the Tar tribe. This may be just the result of his extra vote, or noma, TripleM, and kie might be coordinating their votes to pick off the former Mud tribe, probably followed by Maurog and mxvladi. Or maybe you two did it and I'm now selecting myself as the next target.
Whatever the explanation is, I think it might be of mutual benefit to try to break up that alliance (or potential alliance) now while the relative numbers aren't too bad. My vote is negotiable, but I'm leaning towards TripleM for the next round, since noma will probably be immune. I'm not sure what to do about mxvladi, Maurog, or larrymurk, since I haven't heard much from any of them over the course of the game.
Me to Dischorran:
Click here to view the secret text
×While I may switch to another strategy if I really see that I have a chance to end the game on the top, right now I just kinda want to see the best man win. IIRC I voted for mxvladi last round and I was planning to continue voting for just whoever seemed to not deserve to win.
I am open to negotiations though.
Dex
VIPCOOL to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Did you receive the PM from Dischorran telling us to vote off TripleM next?
I say we vote off Dischorran and eliminate him from the tribe
Yay for back-stabbing
Me to Dischorran:
Click here to view the secret text
×I got this PM from VIPUL:
quote: Did you receive the PM from Dischorran telling us to vote off TripleM next?
I say we vote off Dischorran and eliminate him from the tribe
Yay for back-stabbing
Let's do this
.
Dischorran to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Mm hmm. I don't think he's quite clear on the concept of the jury vote at the end. I guess my vote's settled.
Maurog to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×As you may or may not be aware, there is a coalition of sorts of old Tar players against the Mud players, and right now we are 4 to 2, not in your favor at all. The plan is to pick you Muddies one by one until there are none left, and the plan is working.
This harly seems fair, so to spice up the game, I offer you a one in a lifetime chance - if you both vote Noma in the next council, I assure you the votes will be cast 3-3 between Noma and the Mud member the Tar coalition wants to remove.
What next? I don't know, but it's gonna be fun to watch, eh? You only get one chance to break the tyranny of Tar. Use it well. Cast or change your vote now...
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Hiya Dex.
So I'm thinking it was either kie or Maurog who flipped on my alliance, though in this game it could have been any of the three. When I think about who might think he had the most to benefit the most from flipping, kie comes to mind first. Ah well. Whoever it was, things have certainly gotten more interesting.
Obviously I'd like to stay in the game. So here's a proposition for you that could makes things even more interesting. Since someone in my alliance flipped, I don't need to be loyal to them anymore. However, whoever flipped obviously can't be trusted -- by you either. You have to ask yourself, "What were their reasons for flipping?"
My alliance had (supposedly) decided to keep the strongest players in as long as possible, because that would be "more fun." You were considered to be a strong player, but since you were on the other team, you were slated to go before anyone from our group. (mxvladi was only voted out only because he obviously wasn't into the game anymore.) So whoever flipped on me, may likely flip on you before you get to the final three and take two people with him that he thinks he is certain to beat.
I'm thinking whoever flipped didn't want to be "standing" beside me before the jury, thinking that, because I'm "nice", I might get votes. Trust me, once the jury finds out about my behind-the-scenes scheming and the multiple alliances and fake alliances I set up, they won't think I'm that nice. Besides, I'm really not all that concerned with winning; I'd just like to keep playing as long as possible.
So let's have some fun. We could execute a beautiful blindside. If you switch your vote to larry, then I could definitely ensure that you and I could go to final three with one other (depending on who it was who flipped.) Interested?
Naomi
TripleM to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×I know noma has already contacted you, but perhaps two messages will convince you
As noma said, we've been in an alliance and decided we were more interested in competing in challenges rather than 'winning' which doesn't have much meaning. I've enjoyed all the challenges so far and I'd be sad to see one going on without me there. (In fact, we regretted voting out Dischorran as he seemed the most involved with the game; I didn't think until afterwards we should have joined up with him for the same reasons).
If noma goes, I'm sure I'd be next, and I really don't want that to happen.
Here's how I see it.
If the tiebreaker is based on votes earlier in the game (as in some of the tv series), noma would win. If it is based on some sort of challenge, I think noma would win hands down. If you don't switch your vote, you will definitely be the next one voted off, and you'd have to win the next two immunities to make the final three.
We've got an idea which of Maurog/kie was the one who switched, so if you do help us out, we can make sure they are the next one to go. After that we'll be left in a tricky position as voting either you or the other of Maurog/kie will be breaking an alliance (I'm not sure who I'd choose - perhaps the worst performer in the challenge), but at that stage in the game a single immunity will get you into the final three, and anyone can do that.
So.. do you have anything to say on the matter?
Maurog to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Think Dex, think. Plot, Dex, plot.
You're the man now. I'm sure you got lots of very tempting offers. I'd rather you stick with your current vote, but it's gonna be ok even if you don't. Oh, and either way, if pressured to talk, give away kie, he had an immunity and a motive, with a bit of luck we can get rid of him next.
Me to Maurog:
Click here to view the secret text
×I got your message and I'm thinking about it.
Would you be willing to vote for kie next challenge?
Maurog to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Voting for kie next challenge is the current plan. I'm pretty sure TripleM will vote for kie also.
Me to noma:
Click here to view the secret text
×(before I start: You're not very good at bluffing. Me being considered a "
strong player"
? Not convincing. Anyway...)
So yeah, basically I'm willing to change my vote, but I need some more info. You said you could guarantee me being in the final three in the end, with you. Who else? Would that be TripleM, or the one of the other two who didn't betray you guys (I'm not giving away the name yet)?
Also, I should point out that, even though I do not have any reason to help him/her, I have my reasons to trust the person who flipped, so playing the card "
he betrayed us so he might betray you"
won't help.
So please answer that one question and give me any information/any of your thoughts that might make me more likely to help you
.
Dex
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×(And before I start, I just want to say thanks for getting back to me. Nothing may come of it, but it was considerate. Hmm. Or maybe just a sneaky way to get info?
)
quote: Me being considered a "
strong player"
? Not convincing.
*shrug* It came up in a discussion after we voted Dischorran off (which we regretted afterward.) So that's the bkgd on that remark.
)
You know, in a strange way, this last day has been a lot of fun: trying to figure out who you can really trust, trying to work how to possibly stay in the game. It's a whole new side of the game. When it's all over, maybe we should publish the PM's so that the "
observers"
can see what went on "
behind the scenes."
It'd be amusing.
So now I'm in an unenviable position of possibly betraying one or two people and I know that's part of the game, but... well, I don't like it. Enough dilly dallying. Here's the truth. When I first sent you that PM, I was pretty sure I knew who had flipped and that I could convince at least one of my group that we should go forward with you instead. Now? Gah, who knows? There are good reasons to suspect everyone, and honestly, I don't know who to trust. (And I really am enjoying myself!)
So here are the scenarios: I betray someone in our alliance; you betray the person you have an alliance with; or we make a deal with you and then betray you. None of them thrilling choices, and, besides, neither of us could be certain the other person was going to keep their word. So what to do?
If we end up with another tie this round, larry and I go at it. I could win, I might not. If I do, you're next on the chopping block unless you win immunity. If I don't... well, then you'd have a pretty good shot and I'd wish you luck. If you change your vote, as TripleM proposed, we will vote off the person you tell us flipped, but we have to trust that you are telling us the truth. (More fun!)
Or, since I did come to you, if you let me know who you'd like to go to the final three with, (and I would make no assumptions about why) and if our interests align, then maybe I could dispense with all my "
handwringing"
"
what if's"
and and just move forward. As I said, I don't really care about winning, I'd just like to keep playing.
S'all for now. Naomi
Me to noma
Click here to view the secret text
×What you say seems reasonable to me. Let's try and get to the final three with TripleM. And yes, I will change my vote right now.
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×So be it. And thanks. I'm relieved more because I was worrying that a tie breaker could have been based on a random draw among the people not involved in the original tie, which is how it used to be done on the show. So while larry and I would have safe, someone else would have been randomly eliminated and that would suck.
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×TripleM and I were thinking of collaborating on throws at Maurog before we go for a free for all. Interested in joining us?
Me to noma:
Click here to view the secret text
×Nah, I'll try to get rid of kie first.
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Have fun! I think we all want immunity so this is probably going to be quite the free for all.
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Sorry to have you left you swinging in the wind for so long. I want to play things straight with you. It's been difficult to get a concensus, as you might imagine. I'm getting PM's from X accusing Y, PM's from Y pointing a finger at Z, PM's from -- well, you get the idea. The only thing that everyone seems to agree on (including me to be honest and, to cover my butt, I even sent a PM to that effect) is that the safest course of action is to vote you off.
But since you did change your vote (although I realize it was probably more because of the possibility of the Purple Rock of Death than anything I said) it would be nice to figure out a way to avoid that option. There was one way I thought of that would not only do that, but that would also totally turn the whole game upside down
. However, it would involve a risk on the part of your partner that he/she probably wouldn't be willing to take. It would also be a bit of a risk on my part. But if you have any suggestions, I'm listening.
Me to noma:
Click here to view the secret text
×Well, there's two things which you may need to know.
First, I did actually vote for larry because I was looking forward to a nice alliance with you and TripleM (which was supposed to make me at least survive this round).
Second, I don't have a partner. I got a PM saying that if I voted noma, the vote would be tied and we'd have some fun (and Tar wouldn't continue voting out all the Muddies). Other than that, I didn't strike any deal, nor did I make any alliance. So I wouldn't even be a backstabber if I turned against that person (though it should be noted that I think I could persuade that person to do something if necessary).
So the idea is basically for us to work with TripleM and vote the rest off. Are you all right with that?
Dex
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×I'm okay with it, I just have to convince two of the others. Imagine this: I get separate pm's from X and Y saying the same thing -- they both think it's Z and maybe we should vote him/her off. I get multiple pm's from Z, some pointing at Y, some at X, but Z just wants to vote you off. Then X and Y start to worry that if it wasn't Z who flipped but actually X/Y, then we could end up in a tie situation at the next vote, so maybe we should just vote you off.
Oh the drama. It's so much fun.
It's going to be tough for me to turn two of them around (I know we only need one, but I don't want the other to feel I went behind their backs) without some proof that the person we end up voting for actually is the one who asked you to vote with them.
So you see my problem.
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Hey Dex. As long as things go as planned -- and I'm 99% certain they will -- you're in the final four.
You don't even have to tell us anything. (Although if to show your appreciation, you feel moved to do so, then by all means...
)
I'm not saying who we're voting for... you're going to have to trust us. But I swear I am not voting for you, and that as far as I know, the other two are not voting for you either. You can vote for whoever you want; it shouldn't affect the outcome. *handshake*
Me to noma:
Click here to view the secret text
×After thinking about it, I've decided to tell you and, for now, only you, that it was kie who betrayed you guys. I'm probably going to tell TripleM as well at a certain point, and Maurog will have guessed it already. I'd be thankful if you didn't tell anyone about this message.
Dex
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×I appreciate information. Why do you think Maurog would have guessed it though? Anyway, it doesn't really affect anything. You're still going to be in final four, unless something really surprising has happened in the last 24 hours. Just curious: have you voted yet?
Me to noma:
Click here to view the secret text
×You and TripleM gave me the impression that it was unthinkable of anyone besides Maurog or kie doing it. Which would mean that Maurog will know that kie did it.
And yes, I have voted already.
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Hey Dex. Sheesh, nice going! You had to go and win immunity and totally mess up our plan for final three. That wasn't very thoughtful of you.
So... I'm having an idea. TripleM thinks I'm going to approach you about voting for kie. kie thinks I'm going to ask you to vote for TripleM. (And of course, either or both of them could be asking you to vote for me.) So how about defying all expectations and purposefully creating a tie?
Tell TripleM (and me of course) that you're on board to vote for kie. Tell kie (and me) that you're going to vote for TripleM. TripleM and I vote for kie, and you and kie vote for TripleM. (Or the three of you could just all vote for me, but I think that would be dull.
) This way, either there's a face-off challenge or TripleM, kie and I will have to draw a random number to determine who gets the boot.
Think how much more fun it will for the "
viewers."
What do you think?
kie to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Hey Dex,
Congrats on your immunity - you must have flown through that hold!
I am tending towards voting TripleM, but I thought that as you are the only one assured of a place in the final 3, I would ask for your input. Let me know what you think.
Cheers,
kie
TripleM to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×So, I could say all sorts of things, but let me put this simply. noma + I will be both voting for kie; I assume you will be doing the same.
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×I know that (at this point anyway) you haven't read the other PM yet, but I wanted to confirm that whatever you decide to do, I will be voting for kie.
Me to noma:
Click here to view the secret text
×I'm sending you this PM because I don't want to be completely back-stabby before I do it, so I want to hear your reaction first (and give you the chance to convince me otherwise.
If you are so eager to see a tie-breaker, what would you say about being in the tie-breaker yourself? Why would you want to risk your partner? Especially since consensus seemed to be that we would kick kie out.
Also, I just realised: it would be fairer of me to vote for you than for him, because you actually tried to back-stab him, whereas he was peaceful.
Dex
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Hi Dex. Here's my problem: I've been allies since the start with both TripleM and kie, and so I don't want to vote for either of them. But of course I have to. So my motivation in creating a tie was not to backstab TripleM, but to give us all an equal shot at final three with the Rock of Death, which I think is more likely to happen than a face-off challenge.
If I could arrange a tie where I was the one involved (and I was certain it would be a tie), I'd be happy to do that, but since supposedly TripleM is voting for kie and kie is voting for TripleM, I don't see how to get my name into the mix.
I know you said it was kie who voted for me earlier, but since Maurog ended up voting for kie, not you, in the last vote, it made me wonder. So I figured I'd give kie the benefit of the doubt and give her a chance to stay in the game. But if she really was the one who voted for me, then I'm okay with her being voted off. So I guess I'll just leave it in your hands. ...Where it is already!
noma
Me to kie:
Click here to view the secret text
×Hey kie.
Look, except for that one time where Maurog probably saved me from getting voted out, I have remained blissfully ignorant of any alliance happening in this game. What my instinct tells me to do right now is to ask permission from RoboBob to let me abstain from voting.
I have not done that yet to give you the opportunity to convince me otherwise. So I'm listening
.
Dex
kie to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Hi Dex,
I know that noma has PM'ed you too. She tells me she has voted already and previously she said she was voting TripleM. I don't know if she is telling the truth or not, but she hasn't lied to me until now. I will vote TripleM because I think he will win more jury votes. You have to decide what's best for you! I think you have a good shot at winning with all the ex-muds on the jury. Anyway, it's been fun and all the best for the final round!
Cheers,
kie
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×Hey Dex. Thanks for giving this a shot. Well, shall we see what will happen with another tie? I'm pretty sure you'll be safe since you've got immunity, but who knows what RoboBob3000 set up in his version of the rules. Are you willing to risk it? If you're not, I understand.
noma to me:
Click here to view the secret text
×I'm ready to vote right away and get this over with. I'll still be voting for kie (since I promised TripleM I would never write his name down.) But I do think it would be fun/interesting to find out what happens in a further tie, however I understand if you're hesitant. So if you want to find out, vote for TripleM; if not, vote for kie.