Oh dear - perhaps I didn't choose my words carefully enough ( a terrible admission for an aspiring Writer!
)
Yes I did read all of your post and I haven't taken umbrage - not at all! I have said somewhere else w.l, that I very much admire the fact that you leave a comment for every hold you play - something we should all emulate I think. Your comments are always thoughtful, useful and eloquently expressed and your comment on Castle Steele is no exception. I accept it unreservedly and without any rancour. I knew that you didn't give the Hold a "
1"
(that appeared almost immediately after the Hold was elevated to the Holds board) but re-reading what I wrote it may have seemed that's what I was saying - mea culpa.
I think my feeling is that while I enjoy Architecture - the process itself - there has to be a purpose that is more than just that process. It has become apparent over time that what people on the site seem to want ( I may be wrong here of course) is Holds with difficult, or even very difficult, puzzles. I can't do that; my brain just doesn't seem to work that way.
I take your points about Advanced Concepts and the Hold on which you and Penwielder collaborated, and I am not opposed to collaborating on principal. I'm just not at all sure how on earth I would combine my Seasons/Castle Steele type of hold with something 'lynchpin' based for instance.
"What you do may not necessarily be the most interesting puzzles necessarily, but you do do some pretty amazing stuff, Elfstone. " thank you.
____________________________
Winner of: Novice Architect Excellence 2006.
FAPCA - Technical Design Excellence in Layout and Aesthetics