DiMono wrote:
Any number that doesn't satisfy 3n + 5m would, by definition, be unreachable. I think it's easier to say it's not possible to have a negative score, or 1 or 2 points.
Ah - I was wrong about 23, of course; I misread the instructions as saying you quit after the third jink, not the third jink in a row.
I'm guessing that the puzzle is to list all positive integers that cannot be reached by Jacques. The answer is, quite simply - all the numbers that are too small for the game to end yet. Since the game requires at least 15 points to quit, scores of 14 or less are impossible. For scores over 15, we must find all the scores that can be made with a combination of at least 3 successive jinks.
A score of 16 is unreachable, as is a score of 17, as to end the game with 3 jinks you'd have to start with eithe 1 or 2 points which is impossible. 18 is possible - get a bink, then 3 jinks. 19 is again impossible. 20 is impossible because you have to get 4 jinks in a row to get it, but the game would end after the third. 21 is possible (2 binks, 3 jinks). 22 is impossible (you need 7 to start).
23 is possible - get a jink, a bink, and 3 jinks.
24 is possible - 3 binks, 3 jinks
25 is impossible (you need 5 jinks in a row).
26 is possible - a jink, 2 binks, 3 jinks.
27 is possible - 4 binks, 3 jinks.
28 is possible - 2 jinks, a bink, 3 jinks.
Now you have a sequence of three possible scores in a row, so all scores greater are possible - just add binks accordingly.
Therefore, the highest unreachable score is 25. Jacques is clearly a liar. What would it matter since the game is based entirely on luck and not on skill is a different question.
---
Assuming I didn't miss anything, I'll just resubmit Avon's puzzle as my own to solve that mess (I know the answer to it, so I can judge it if he doesn't want to).
[Edited by eytanz on 06-14-2004 at 09:46 AM GMT]
____________________________
I got my avatar back! Yay!