Banjooie
Level: Smitemaster
Rank Points: 1645
Registered: 12-12-2004
IP: Logged
|
Re: What defines a bump "okay"? (+2)
A general guide to forum necromancy.
1: Does the forum prefer you revive an earlier thread, or post a new one?
This changes from forum to forum. Generally, my guide is: If it's on the last couple pages, revive, if not, post a new one, unless it's some hideously massive thread of unbelievable power, in which case, you know, you revive it if you have some worthwhile contribution.
2: IS your contribution worthwhile?
Why are you bumping? Is it like the Riddle of the Trinket, where we've been frickin' wondering for like years and it still hasn't been solved? Is it the Riddle of the Bar thread, because you noticed if you click the 245th pixel from the right, 17th from the bottom, your rank point total becomes 9001? Or is it the predict the next poster thread, because you hate puppies and rainbows.
If you have a good contribution to the thread, bumping is always worthwhile.
3: If you don't have a worthwhile contribution, is there something in the thread everyone needs to see again?
Remember, we've all probably read the thread. If there's a reason we'll want to read it again, sure, bump it for us. If not, or you just want to say 'that's an awesome thread'--we know it's an awesome thread. We posted it. We were there, it was absolutely frigging killer. No bump necessary, or desired.
4: Finding the thread in the search function and failing miserably at reading dates!
We've all done it. It's cool. Your best thing here is to edit and go 'oh crap, this is like two years old'.
|