Alneyan
Level: Smitemaster
Rank Points: 622
Registered: 07-06-2004
IP: Logged
|
Re: war6 (0)
That was Oneiromancer's second point: if you create another hold including already-existing holds, you will have two versions of the same hold around, meaning two lists of high scores. Both lists wouldn't be identical either, so you would have a pretty confused situation.
Some of the holds suffering from this are Eytanz's Tumb (released well before high scores appeared) and HIJK, a compilation of Happy House, Impossible Cubes, the previous unreleased Jigsaw Feeling, and Killing Jar, which also improved all the holds somewhat. Creating a hold including already-existing holds might be worthwhile, if it involves some other improvements, but I fail to see the point otherwise.
If you wish to compare performances between all six war holds, I suppose you can always do the maths yourselves (which would be faster than copying and pasting all holds into one); the War holds are also not exactly the most played out there, so I doubt high scores will reflect much. On the other hand, if the War holds were heavily contested score-wise, creating a new high score list for the same rooms would be even more problematic: the more players have done a hold, the more important the discrepancies between the two high scores lists will be.
|
After a few rooms you have enough. Therefore I think that those war holds are quite bad ones. 
