I said it wasn't impossible - which in no way maps to "
it's easy"
.
Obviously you'd need a human level of comprehension and logic. But nobody's proven that's impossible, and I find it highly unlikely that it's impossible.
Solving an NP-complete problem is, while not technically impossible, totally impractical. (Well, it's believed so - that still hasn't been proven yet either.) Something as "
minor"
as making an AI capable of human-level thought isn't known to be impractical - we just don't know how to do it.
It's the difference between "
proven impractical"
and "
not known"
.