Beef Row
Level: Smiter
Rank Points: 471
Registered: 12-28-2005
IP: Logged

Karma would be another nice way to sort the holds, preferably in order of (Good Karma - Bad Karma / Total Karma) (But 0 if there are no karma ratings at all to avoid divide by zero issues.)

Ability to sort purely by good karma and purely by bad karma wouldn't hurt either.

Sorting by number of monsters would be handy too, if you're looking specifically for either sparse populated dungeons, or horde puzzles. (why is number of monsters listed on the holds thread, but not in the hold list anyway? is this a space issue?)

____________________________
"Now I will repeatedly apply the happy-face rule"

Briareos
Level: Smitemaster

Rank Points: 3516
Registered: 08-07-2005
IP: Logged

While we're at it - how about throwing "number of rooms" into the mix? That would help a lot if you're looking for a small hold because you don't have much time...

(Which of course doesn't mean that you can't spend ages per room still... )

____________________________
"I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole
R.I.P. Robert Feldhoff (1962-2009)

---

[Last edited by Briareos at 09-03-2008 09:10 AM]

Beef Row
Level: Smiter
Rank Points: 471
Registered: 12-28-2005
IP: Logged

Well, on the master list of holds on the website you can already sort by number of rooms. I see that on the ingame download screen you can't though. Yeah, I'd say adding "# of rooms" there would be nice.

____________________________
"Now I will repeatedly apply the happy-face rule"