I'm giving Mozilla another go, at the moment (actually, that's not quite true. Screw Mozilla: I'm using Firebird). I may switch to Avant just for the compatibility.
As for the browser wars going on here: the way it stands is that Firebird has many interesting features but not as much support. It may be more standards-compliant than IE, but the pages don't
work. Part of this (and this is probably what trick was referring to) is the fact that Firebird is at version 0.6 - that ain't anywhere near release, although the browser is already about as good as IE (despite the fact its Java pop-ups measures err on the side of draconian - sometimes I want it to pop-up). Part of this is the deliberate design decisions to go with standards instead of what everyone does (for example, Mozilla and Firebird both won't ALT text as a tooltip, in contrast to IE and more than a few web designers).
The Firebird designers want their users to take on an 'advocate' role promoting the browser. My thoughts: Pointless. Firebird will only get some sort of strength when Microsoft drops the ball and doesn't update their browser at all (which is very much on the horizon, I might add). Then you'll see the Mozilla/Firebird buttons come out, much as the Netscape buttons did. Who remembers those?
Frankly, the only reason I have Mozilla in the first place is my Gamasutra cookie. I have major troubles logging onto that site.
I haven't ever suffered under the delusion that the Gecko browsers were more popular than IE, mainly because I understand why the majority of people aren't switching to Linux - as Oneiromancer said, they're happy enough with IE.
Matt
____________________________
What do you call an elephant at the North Pole?
Click here to view the secret text
×Lost.