Jatopian
Level: Smitemaster
Rank Points: 1842
Registered: 07-31-2005
IP: Logged

File: JtRH Sixth Level 1S1E Slayer kill.demo (2.5 KB)
Downloaded 73 times.
License: Public Domain

Seriously, I have found a pattern to many of the off-script Slayer kills. It goes like this:
In fact, this can be used as early as L3:2N1W. I suggest this fix:Of course, I am not Mike Rimer and I am unsure whether this or any fix is feasible or desirable, but I hope someone finds this helpful, or at least cool.

____________________________
DROD has some really great music.
Make your pressure plates 3.0 style!
DROD architecture idea generator

---

[Last edited by Jatopian at 01-05-2006 05:34 AM : attached correct demo]

agaricus5
Level: Smitemaster
Rank Points: 1838
Registered: 02-04-2003
IP: Logged

Jatopian wrote:
Seriously, I have found a pattern to many of the off-script Slayer kills. It goes like this:

Click here to view the secret text

×

f f f B W
f f / f W
f f \\ f W
f f f S W
f f f f W
f f f W W
W W W W W

Beethro moves south and forces the Slayer south until Slayer moves to (3,2) and the hook is NW.
Beethro moves south and blades cross at (3,3).
Beethro moves south; Slayer dies.

In fact, this can be used as early as L3:2N1W.

I'm pretty sure that the highscore in JtRH: L3 2N 1W (or one of the nearby rooms) is dependent on that very set of moves, if I'm not wrong. Also, it's a technique I (and probably others) use quite often to manipulate the Slayer in tight areas, so changing it would effectively mean learning a new Slayer strategy, which could be problematic.

I suggest this fix:

Click here to view the secret text

×When Beethro moves [south, in the example], their blades briefly cross (for less than a turn). The Slayer retreats. Instead, he should point the hook directly at Beethro, forcing Beethro to retreat or cross again.

Of course, I am not Mike Rimer and I am unsure whether this or any fix is feasible or desirable, but I hope someone finds this helpful, or at least cool.

It's a fix that would work for this particular scenario, but it wouldn't work if there was an empty square to the northeast of the Slayer in your example. Beethro could step diagonally on the next move to kill the Slayer.

____________________________
Resident Medic/Mycologist

Jatopian
Level: Smitemaster
Rank Points: 1842
Registered: 07-31-2005
IP: Logged

agaricus5 wrote:
it's a technique I (and probably others) use quite often to manipulate the Slayer in tight areas, so changing it would effectively mean learning a new Slayer strategy, which could be problematic.

I suggest this fix:

Click here to view the secret text

×When Beethro moves [south, in the example], their blades briefly cross (for less than a turn). The Slayer retreats. Instead, he should point the hook directly at Beethro, forcing Beethro to retreat or cross again.

Of course, I am not Mike Rimer and I am unsure whether this or any fix is feasible or desirable, but I hope someone finds this helpful, or at least cool.

It's a fix that would work for this particular scenario, but it wouldn't work if there was an empty square to the northeast of the Slayer in your example. Beethro could step diagonally on the next move to kill the Slayer.

Vice versa; the Slayer would step diagonally to kill him, unless coming from north, in which case the Slayer would move into that space.

____________________________
DROD has some really great music.
Make your pressure plates 3.0 style!
DROD architecture idea generator

coppro
Level: Smitemaster
Rank Points: 1308
Registered: 11-24-2005
IP: Logged

No, the first thing Slayer does is ask "Can I kill Beethro?" he then kills him. Otherwise, he has some long AI algorithm. If he were changed to swing his sword and there was a square NE of him, then he would have alreaady killed Beethro.

rowrow
Level: Smiter
Rank Points: 432
Registered: 08-17-2004
IP: Logged

Maybe there should be a drod contest:
Create a code for the slayer where it is impossible for the slayer to be killed.
(just joking)

____________________________
B'hakhgra Du S'tra Moth'ness Ti!

Syntax
Level: Smitemaster
Rank Points: 1218
Registered: 05-12-2005
IP: Logged

That's an easy one... run around the hold !!!

Seriously though, changing the behaviour would also break countless demos.

Doom
Level: Smitemaster

Rank Points: 3226
Registered: 07-05-2004
IP: Logged

rowrow wrote:
Maybe there should be a drod contest:
Create a code for the slayer where it is impossible for the slayer to be killed.

Invincibility On

Do I win?

---

[Last edited by Doom at 02-04-2006 08:34 AM : typo]

Chaco
Level: Smitemaster
Rank Points: 3624
Registered: 10-06-2005
IP: Logged

No, because

1) You misspelled invincibility
2) Your character isn't even visible yet or
3) defined as a slayer

____________________________
Quick links to my stuff (in case you forgot where it was):

Doom
Level: Smitemaster

Rank Points: 3226
Registered: 07-05-2004
IP: Logged

Chaco wrote:
No, because

1) You misspelled invincibility

Wow, I can't believe that. I always thought it's spelled like that... But I guess dictionary.com doesn't lie.

2) Your character isn't even visible yet or
3) defined as a slayer

Well, the original message told you to make a code for the Slayer, so it obviously can't be for anything else. As for the visibility, that isn't part of the scripting, so I just ignored it.

Blondbeard
Level: Smitemaster

Rank Points: 1486
Registered: 03-31-2005
IP: Logged

Hmm. I just realized it's very easy to kill slayers where you have access to tunnels. It can't be so hard to include the knowledge of tunnels in the slayer AI?

Chaco
Level: Smitemaster
Rank Points: 3624
Registered: 10-06-2005
IP: Logged

Pseudo-code:

IF tunnel_location = insidedangerzone THEN
 IF beethro_location = neartunnel THEN
  runawayfromtunnel();
 END IF
ELSE
 continuetopursuebeethro();
END IF

____________________________
Quick links to my stuff (in case you forgot where it was):

---

[Last edited by Chaco at 02-03-2006 10:49 PM]

Oneiromancer
Level: Legendary Smitemaster

Rank Points: 2936
Registered: 03-29-2003
IP: Logged

Yeah, it would be that hard. And really not necessary-Slayers are not invincible. The 39th Slayer in JtRH is meant to be, because he was smart enough not to show up in rooms where it was easy to kill him (and also have Beethro escape). This is why he almost never shows up in rooms with bombs, mimic/decoy potions, or tunnels. I think it is perfectly reasonable to leave tunnels the way they are, so the architect needs to be aware that they may be a way to kill a Slayer.

Game on,

____________________________
"He who is certain he knows the ending of things when he is only beginning them is either extremely wise or extremely foolish; no matter which is true, he is certainly an unhappy man, for he has put a knife in the heart of wonder." -- Tad Williams

Jatopian
Level: Smitemaster
Rank Points: 1842
Registered: 07-31-2005
IP: Logged

rowrow wrote:
Maybe there should be a drod contest:
Create a code for the slayer where it is impossible for the slayer to be killed.
(just joking)

It should be easy in TCB; with relative movement we could do 'if relative (x,y) = non-steppable then'. Of course that assumes no mimic/decoy potions etc.

____________________________
DROD has some really great music.
Make your pressure plates 3.0 style!
DROD architecture idea generator

skarnet
Level: Goblin
Rank Points: 20
Registered: 07-12-2005
IP: Logged

I hope the Slayer AI won't be changed, because a friend and I are heavily relying on it in a hold we're designing, and which features a certain amount of Slayer kills.

If you design a really unkillable AI, please make it a new character, and keep the Slayer as he is - he's not invincible, but really tricky to beat, and that's what we want

____________________________
skarnet

mrimer
Level: Legendary Smitemaster

Rank Points: 5056
Registered: 02-04-2003
IP: Logged

Yeah, I think it's too late for changing any existing 2.0 monster logic unless some glaring bug is uncovered.

____________________________
Gandalf? Yes... That's what they used to call me.
Gandalf the Grey. That was my name.
I am Gandalf the White.
And I come back to you now at the turn of the tide.

---

[Last edited by mrimer at 02-12-2006 02:55 AM]