Doing the actual math in your calculations:
a 0.03 increase out of about roughly 2 to go is not a large imporvement, but a 0.06 increase is, again relative to the same proprtion of 2 overall to get to 100%?
That's like saying a 3 out of 200 improvement is not good, while a 6 out of 200 improvement is, even though they're roughly about the same quantity.
I know again that isn't the actual number, but in this case because it's an underestimation of the actual total amount the actual ratios would just make my point more clear that your judgements of what is a good increase vs a bad increase are pretty bizarre.
____________________________
Please feel free to test the ultimate arena:
King Azb's Arena today!
[Last edited by azb at 10-09-2023 04:03 PM : Make my wording more clear]