Blondbeard wrote:
Ezlo's idea sounds a lot like what I've been thinking.
I would also like it if everybodys modpoints at the begining of a new week was set to some agreed upon number (maybe ten). In this way you wouldn't be able to hoard mod points, and everybody would have the power to say they like a certain post (particulary I think it might be a good feeling for newcommers wha asks for hints to label the post that helped them as good. As it is now that is not possible).
I disagree. It's not that good as it sounds if anyone has the same amount of mod points. It's just fair that the amount of mod-points you have is proportional to the amount of good posts/things you contribute to the community. Also, what would be the point of winning let's say 50 mod points? If you don't use them as fast as you can they're gone.
The problem is not the modding-system, it's the way some people use it. And even if we decided to use a new system people would find a way to abuse it or would get annoyed by it. The modding system is intended as a way of saying "
I like your post"
or "
I don't like your post"
without making a post and to prevent people flooding the place in order to get a high post-count. Reasons for moddings are good/bad contents, good/bad format, good/bad attatchments, good/inapropriate jokes, etc. Now if a few people aren't mature enough to use the system in a senseful way, why should we make such a fuss about it? Would Microsoft withdraw every copy of Windows because a few people are making stupid things with it or abuse some of the included tools (fdisk for example)?
The only suggestion I could agree on is to set a limit how high a single post can be modded (+/- 5 for example). A suggestion of myself is just to calm down and reflect a little bit on the whole situation. Is it really THAT horrible? I guess the answer is no.